The Intriguing Case of Savoia NYC Incorporated vs. Parris Mayhew: A Detailed Examination of WIPO Case D2021-0225

The domain name dispute case D2021-0225, adjudicated by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), involved Savoia NYC Incorporated and Parris Mayhew. Savoia NYC Incorporated, the complainant, contended rights over the domain name “cro-mags.com,” claiming that it was identical to their trademark “CRO-MAGS.” Parris Mayhew, the respondent, self-represented, disputed these claims.

The case unfolded with Savoia NYC asserting that Mayhew had no legitimate interests in the domain name and had registered it in bad faith, intending to profit from their trademark. However, Mayhew presented a compelling argument, underscoring that the domain name registration predates Savoia NYC’s trademark by several years and was registered with knowledge and consent of Harley Flanagan, a figure closely associated with both parties.

Mayhew’s connection with the CRO-MAGS band and his significant role in its establishment and development were pivotal in establishing his rights and legitimate interests in the domain name. He argued that the domain name’s registration and usage were in good faith, highlighting the historical and personal relevance of the domain to his career and contributions to the CRO-MAGS band.

The WIPO panel meticulously analyzed the evidence and arguments, ultimately ruling in favor of Mayhew. The decision hinged on the recognition of Mayhew’s established connection with the CRO-MAGS trademark and his rights to the domain name, stemming from his integral role in the band’s history and his joint ownership of related trademarks with Flanagan.

The case concluded with a significant ruling, rejecting Savoia NYC’s complaint and determining that the complaint was brought in bad faith, constituting a case of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking. This decision underscored the importance of historical rights and legitimate interests in domain name disputes, reaffirming the need for comprehensive consideration of all relevant facts and timelines in such cases.

For further details, you can refer to the full decision on the WIPO website: WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2021-0225.

The domain name dispute case D2021-0225, adjudicated by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), involved Savoia NYC Incorporated and Parris Mayhew. Savoia NYC Incorporated, the complainant, contended rights over the domain name “cro-mags.com,” claiming that it was identical to their trademark “CRO-MAGS.” Parris Mayhew, the respondent, self-represented, disputed these claims. The case unfolded with Savoia…