Unraveling the Complexities of WIPO Case D2017-2095: Airtango AG vs. Privacydotlink Customer 2290723 / Gustavo Winchester

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2017-2095, adjudicated on December 11, 2017, centered around the domain name “airtango.com.” The complainant in the case was Airtango AG, and the respondent was Privacydotlink Customer 2290723 / Gustavo Winchester. Tony Willoughby served as the sole panelist overseeing the proceedings.

Airtango AG brought the complaint under the assumption that the domain name was confusingly similar to their trademark and that the respondent had no legitimate interest in the domain name. They further claimed that the domain name was registered and being used in bad faith.

However, the panelist’s decision favored the respondent, denying the complaint. The case’s resolution underlines the complexity of domain name disputes and the stringent requirements for establishing a claim under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP).

For more detailed information on this case, please visit the WIPO’s case summary.

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2017-2095, adjudicated on December 11, 2017, centered around the domain name “airtango.com.” The complainant in the case was Airtango AG, and the respondent was Privacydotlink Customer 2290723 / Gustavo Winchester. Tony Willoughby served as the sole panelist overseeing the proceedings. Airtango AG brought the complaint under the assumption that…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *