Analysis of WIPO Case D2012-1193: Wall-Street.com, LLC v. Marcus Kocak / Internet Opportunity Entertainment (Sports) Limited, Sportingbet PLC

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2012-1193 involved the domain name . The complainant, Wall-Street.com, LLC from Florida, USA, contended that the domain name was confusingly similar to its trademark WALL-STREET.COM. The respondents included Marcus Kocak of Denmark, Internet Opportunity Entertainment (Sports) Limited of Antigua and Barbuda, and Sportingbet PLC of the UK.

Wall-Street.com, LLC, asserted rights based on their trademark and domain name , while the respondents, affiliated with Sportingbet PLC, argued for their legitimate interests in . They claimed common control of the domain since 2001 and highlighted its usage, including for pay-per-click (PPC) websites related to financial services. The complainant argued bad faith registration and use by the respondents, citing attempts to sell the domain and misleading use for commercial gain.

The panel’s decision in this case took into account the historical control and use of the domain, the nature of the trademark involved, and the actions of both parties regarding the disputed domain name.

For more detailed information on this case, you can visit the WIPO website: WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2012-1193.

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2012-1193 involved the domain name . The complainant, Wall-Street.com, LLC from Florida, USA, contended that the domain name was confusingly similar to its trademark WALL-STREET.COM. The respondents included Marcus Kocak of Denmark, Internet Opportunity Entertainment (Sports) Limited of Antigua and Barbuda, and Sportingbet PLC of the UK. Wall-Street.com, LLC,…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *