Author: Staff

In the domain name dispute case D2017-0650, the central issue revolved around the domain name . This case was particularly noteworthy due to the finding of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH). The dispute involved complex arguments about trademark rights, legitimate interests, and the criteria for bad faith in domain registration and use. Parties Involved Complainant:…

The domain name dispute case of Normann Copenhagen ApS v. Peter Normann, with the case number D2017-0829, was a notable instance involving a claim of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH). Background of the Case Complainant: Normann Copenhagen ApS, a leading Danish design firm established in 1999, held several registrations for the trademark NORMANN COPENHAGEN and…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2000-1202 involved a specific domain name, with the complainant and respondent engaging in a legal battle over its ownership and use. The case was adjudicated under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), a policy developed by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to resolve…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2006-0609 involved the domain name “dreamgirls.com”. The complainant in this case was Dreamgirls, Inc., and the respondent was Dreamgirls Entertainment. The panel, consisting of David H. Bernstein (Presiding), M. Scott Donahey, and Jonathan Hudis, made the decision on August 10, 2006. The complaint was denied, indicating that the panel…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2007-0770 involved the domain name “fcc.com”. The complainant was FCC Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas, SA of Madrid, Spain, and the respondent was “FCC.COM” of New York, United States. The panel, consisting of Tony Willoughby, Manuel Moreno-Torres, and Nelson A. Diaz, made the decision on October 7, 2007. The…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2008-0091 involved a dispute over a specific domain name. The complainant in this case was an entity or individual seeking to assert their rights over the domain name in question, while the respondent was the current holder of the domain name. The decision in this case, like in other…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2008-1149 involved multiple domain names, including alohaapartments.net, arubabeachresort.com, belairresort.net, broadbeachonthepark.com, crowntowersresort.net, enderleygardens.com, equinoxresort.net, imperialsurfresort.com, moroccanresort.com, phoenicianresortapartments.com, raysresort.net, siroccoapartments.com, sttropezresort.com, and zanzibarresort.com. The complainant was Stella IP Pty Ltd., and the respondents were Info Link, Info-Link, and Paul Klerck. The panelists James A. Barker (Presiding), The Hon Neil Brown K.C.,…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2008-1545 involved the domain name “norsk.com”. The complainant in this case was Parallax Group International, Limited Liability Corporation, and the respondent was Anything.com Ltd. The panelists who decided on this case were Michelle Brownlee, David E. Sorkin, and John Swinson (Presiding). The decision was made on December 15, 2008,…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2010-0606 involved the domain name “altom.com”. The complainant in this case was S.C. ALTOM CONSULTING S.R.L., while the respondent was Domain Administrator, PortMedia / Moniker Privacy Services. The decision, made by a panel including Alexiev Assen, The Hon Neil Brown K.C., and Andrew F. Christie, was reached on September…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2012-1326, the complainant was S.C. ALTOM CONSULTING S.R.L., and the respondent was Domain Administrator, PortMedia / Moniker Privacy Services. The case revolved around the domain name “altom.com”. The panelists involved in this decision were Alexiev Assen (Presiding), Brown K.C., The Hon Neil, and Christie, Andrew F. The decision…