Author: Staff

The Intricacies of WIPO Domain Name Case D2020-1822: Green Globe Limited vs. Domains By Proxy, LLC / Green Globe LLC

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2020-1822, Green Globe Limited, a UK-based company, contested the domain name greenglobe.com, registered by Domains By Proxy, LLC / Green Globe LLC, based in the USA. The case centered around the legitimacy and use of the domain name, with Green Globe Limited asserting trademark rights over “Green Globe,”…

continue reading
No Comments

Analyzing the WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case D2020-2608

In the WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case No. D2020-2608, the complainant was Wedi GmbH, a German company, against the respondent Dong Jin Kim from the Republic of Korea. The case revolved around the domain name wedi.com. Wedi GmbH, established in 1983, had international trademark registrations for WEDI, including a registration from 2002. However, the domain…

continue reading
No Comments

In-Depth Review of WIPO Case D2019-1338: Miami International Holdings, Inc. v. Dong Jin Kim

In the domain name dispute case D2019-1338, Miami International Holdings, Inc., a US-based company, filed a complaint against Dong Jin Kim of the Republic of Korea over the domain name . The complaint was filed on June 11, 2019, with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. Miami International Holdings, Inc., which had registered the MIAX…

continue reading
No Comments

Detailed Analysis of WIPO Case D2019-1545: Brooksburnett Investments Ltd. vs. Domain Admin / Schmitt Sebastien

In WIPO Case No. D2019-1545, Brooksburnett Investments Ltd., based in Cyprus, filed a complaint against Domain Admin / Schmitt Sebastien from France regarding the domain name . The complaint was filed on February 27, 2019. Brooksburnett claimed that the domain name was identical to their INCANTO trademark, which they held in multiple countries. They argued…

continue reading
No Comments

Exploring WIPO Case D2019-1806: Tox Pressotechnik GmbH & Co. KG vs. TFourth LLC

In the WIPO Case No. D2019-1806, Tox Pressotechnik GmbH & Co. KG, a German company, filed a complaint against TFourth, LLC, over the domain name . The complaint was filed in September 2022. Tox Pressotechnik, a manufacturer of industrial tools, holds several TOX trademarks. They argued that the domain name, registered by TFourth LLC in…

continue reading
No Comments

Examination of WIPO Case D2019-2073: Religare Health Insurance Company Limited vs. Name Administration Inc. / Domain Administrator

In the domain name dispute case D2019-2073, Religare Health Insurance Company Limited from India, represented by Saikrishna & Associates, filed a complaint against Name Administration Inc., Grand Cayman, over the domain name . The complaint was filed on August 23, 2019. Religare, a health insurer, claimed that the domain name was confusingly similar to their…

continue reading
No Comments

In-Depth Analysis of WIPO Case D2019-2489: Adventure SAS vs. Mike Robinson, BlackHawk Paramotors USA Inc.

In the WIPO Case No. D2019-2489, Adventure SAS, a French company manufacturing and selling paramotors, paragliders, and trikes, filed a complaint against Mike Robinson of BlackHawk Paramotors USA Inc., concerning the domain name . The complaint was filed on October 10, 2019. Adventure SAS argued that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to…

continue reading
No Comments

The WIPO Case D2019-2925: Universidad Privada De Madrid, S.A. vs. Vince Harasymiak, Domain Capital

In the domain name dispute case D2019-2925, Universidad Privada De Madrid, S.A. (UNIVERSIDAD ALFONSO X EL SABIO -UAX), represented by Legal Things Abogados, Spain, filed a complaint against Vince Harasymiak of Domain Capital, United States. The case centered on the domain name “uax.com,” registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC. The complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration…

continue reading
No Comments

Analysis of the WIPO Case D2019-3138: Nu Pagamentos S.A vs. Dan Hudson, Nubank

In the domain name dispute case D2019-3138, Nu Pagamentos S.A, a Brazilian company providing banking and financial services, filed a complaint against Dan Hudson, Nubank of the United States, over the domain name nubank.com. The complaint was filed on December 18, 2019, and the decision was made on February 14, 2020. Nu Pagamentos S.A claimed…

continue reading
No Comments

RDNH Case DAU2019-0031

In the WIPO domain name dispute case DAU2019-0031, the complainant was Smartmark Pty Ltd, and the respondent was Robert Kaay. The disputed domain name was “smartmark.com.au.” The decision on this case was made by a panel consisting of Andrew F. Christie (Presiding), Alan L. Limbury, and John Swinson. The decision date was February 19, 2020.…

continue reading
No Comments