Category: RDNH

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2008-0779, Hero, a Swiss food manufacturer, filed a complaint against The Heroic Sandwich of Berkeley, California, for the domain name . Hero claimed the domain was identical to its trademark and accused The Heroic Sandwich of bad faith registration and use. However, the panel found no evidence that…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2007-1598, Liquid Nutrition Inc. filed a complaint against LIQUIDNUTRITION.COM/Vertical Axis Inc. over the domain name . The decision in this case was made by panelists Brown K.C., The Hon Neil Lyon, Richard G. (Presiding), and Sorkin, David E., and the decision date was January 28, 2008. The panel…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2005-0309, Jazeera Space Channel TV Station, based in Doha, Qatar, filed a complaint against an entity known as Publishing, located in the United Arab Emirates, over the domain name . The case was represented on the complainant’s side by Al Tamimi & Company. The dispute centered around the…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2004-0158, Domain Finance Ltd, the complainant, filed a case against an unnamed respondent over the domain name . The specific details of the case, including the arguments made by both parties, the evidence presented, and the reasoning behind the decision, are crucial to understanding the panel’s ruling. The…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2002-0754 is a noteworthy instance in the realm of internet domain name disputes. Unfortunately, specific details about this case, such as the domain name in question, the identities of the complainant and respondent, and the finer points of their arguments, are not readily available in the public domain. However,…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2001-1357, adjudicated in 2001, is an important case in the realm of internet domain name disputes, particularly noted for its outcome involving a decision of “Reverse Domain Name Hijacking” (RDNH). Unfortunately, the specific details about this case, such as the domain name in question, the identities of the complainant…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2001-0798, resolved in 2001, stands out in the history of internet domain name disputes for its outcome involving a decision of “Reverse Domain Name Hijacking” (RDNH). While the specific details about this case, such as the domain name in dispute, the identities of the complainant and respondent, and the…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2000-0993, adjudicated in 2000, is a significant case in the history of internet domain name disputes, particularly noted for its outcome involving a decision of “Reverse Domain Name Hijacking” (RDNH). This case involved a dispute over the domain name , with Smart Design LLC as the complainant and Carolyn…

The case D2018-0505, a domain name dispute decided under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), is one of the many cases handled by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). WIPO is a global leader in resolving issues of cybersquatting through the UDRP, providing a swift and cost-effective administrative process for resolving domain name…

In the domain name dispute case D2018-0348, adjudicated under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the conflict revolved around the domain name hmrcrevenuegovuk.com. The complainant in this case was The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs from London, United Kingdom, represented by Demys Limited. The respondent…