Category: RDNH

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2018-0793, Compañía Logística de Hidrocarburos CLH S.A., a Spanish company, filed a complaint against Privacy Administrator, Anonymize, Inc. / Sam Dennis of Investments.org Inc, regarding the domain name “clh.com”. The Complainant alleged that the domain was identical to their trademark and that the Respondent had no rights or…

In the intricate landscape of domain name disputes, Case D2019-1584 presents a compelling narrative, illustrating the complexities and legal nuances inherent in such cases. This case, adjudicated under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), provides a valuable lens through which to understand the delicate balance between the rights of domain name holders and…

In the notable domain name dispute case of Red Dot GmbH & Co. KG v. Perfect Privacy, LLC / Schuweiler, R. & S. (Case No. D2019-0785), the central issue revolved around the domain name red-dot.com. Red Dot GmbH & Co. KG, a German organization known for its prestigious design awards, filed a complaint against the…

In the domain name dispute case Sport and Fashion, Pte. Ltd. v. St. Lawrence Cement Inc. (Case No. D2019-0603), the dispute centered around the domain name “demix.com.” The complainant, Sport and Fashion, Pte. Ltd., a Singapore-based company involved in the sports equipment industry, contended that the domain name was identical to its DEMIX trademark and…

In the domain name dispute case DAU2019-0029, Sportsbet Pty Ltd, The Sporting Exchange Ltd, and Flutter Entertainment Plc (collectively the Complainants) contested the use of the domain name “flutter.com.au” registered by Gaming Investments Pty Ltd (the Respondent). This case was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center on September 27, 2019. The Complainants, part…

In the WIPO case D2018-2768, Dialoga Servicios Interactivos, S.A., a Spanish telecommunications company, filed a complaint against Finlead AG, a Swiss company specializing in domain name investments, over the domain name “dialoga.com.” The complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center on December 3, 2018. Dialoga Servicios Interactivos argued that the domain name…

The WIPO case D2018-2385 involved a domain name dispute between Dialoga Servicios Interactivos, S.A., a Spanish telecommunications company, and Finlead AG, a Swiss company specializing in domain name investments, over the domain name “dialoga.com”. The case was filed on December 3, 2018, with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. Dialoga Servicios Interactivos argued that the…

In the domain name dispute case D2019-3128, the complainant, Acubit A/S, a Danish technology company, filed a complaint against Ting Zhao, the registrant of the domain name ‘acubit.com’. The complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center on December 18, 2019. Acubit A/S, established in Denmark and specializing in location technology, claimed rights…

In the case D2019-2468, Praetorian Legal Limited, a UK-based timeshare termination company, filed a complaint against Michael Ross over the domain name ‘tess-timeshare.com’. Filed on October 9, 2019, with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, the complaint was based on the claim that Praetorian had unregistered trademark rights in the term ‘timeshare’. The domain, registered…

In the domain name dispute case D2019-2060, the complainant, Düş Yeri Bilişim Teknoloji ve Animasyon Anonim Şirketi from Turkey, contested the domain ‘pepee.com’, held by Gregg Ostrick, GNO, Inc., from the United States. The complaint was filed on August 22, 2019, with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. The crux of the dispute revolved around…