Category: RDNH

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2017-1235 involved a complaint by Paola Stephania Ornelas Magaña and Irma Michelle Ornelas Magaña against Media Insight regarding the domain names goldenparnassuscancun.com and greatparnassuscancun.com. The complainants, operating resorts in Cancun, Mexico, accused Media Insight of confusingly similar domain names to their trademarks. However, Media Insight, a travel package provider…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2018-2238, the complainant, Darryl Davis Seminars, Inc., challenged the registration of the domain name . The respondent was Privacydotlink Customer 656889 / Domain Admin, Abstract Holdings International Ltd. The disputed domain name, registered on July 18, 2002, was associated with a parking page featuring generic pay-per-click links and…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2018-2083, WEDIA SA, a French company specialized in software solutions for marketing and communication, filed a complaint against Office Yui Asia Limited, a Japanese corporation. The dispute involved the domain name , registered by the respondent since June 15, 1997. WEDIA SA argued that the domain name, which…

In the WIPO case D2018-1849, Tenaris Connections BV filed a complaint against HugeDomains.com over the domain name . Tenaris, part of the Tenaris Group, a global manufacturer and supplier in the oil and gas industry, argued that the domain was confusingly similar to its trademark “TENARIS”. However, the panel found no evidence that HugeDomains.com, a…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2018-1580, Mobius Payments Corporation filed a complaint against David Gobaud over the domain name . The complainant, a payment processing company, claimed rights to the “MOBIUS” trademarks and alleged that the domain was confusingly similar to its marks. The respondent, CEO of Mochi Inc., argued that the domain…

In WIPO case D2018-1323, the complainant Gesab, S.A. filed a complaint against Domain Admin / Oyo AS regarding the domain name . The panelist for the case was Lawrence K. Nodine. The decision, made on July 8, 2018, was to deny the complaint. This case highlights the complexities and challenges in domain name disputes, particularly…

In WIPO case D2018-0973, the complainant, Compañía Logística de Hidrocarburos CLH, S.A., based in Madrid, Spain, contested the domain , owned by DropCatcher.Info / Badminton, Inc. The proceedings began on May 3, 2018, with the complaint alleging that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to its CLH trademarks, arguing for trademark infringement. However,…

The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center’s decision on the domain name dispute case D2019-0263, Feev Holding B.V. v. Firas Dabboussi, involved the domain “feev.com.” Feev Holding B.V. from the Netherlands, represented by Mouritz Legal, filed a complaint against Firas Dabboussi of the United States, who was self-represented. The domain in question, registered since February 22,…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case DAU2019-0031, the complainant was Smartmark Pty Ltd, and the respondent was Robert Kaay. The disputed domain name was “smartmark.com.au.” The decision on this case was made by a panel consisting of Andrew F. Christie (Presiding), Alan L. Limbury, and John Swinson. The decision date was February 19, 2020.…

In the domain name dispute case D2019-3138, Nu Pagamentos S.A, a Brazilian company providing banking and financial services, filed a complaint against Dan Hudson, Nubank of the United States, over the domain name nubank.com. The complaint was filed on December 18, 2019, and the decision was made on February 14, 2020. Nu Pagamentos S.A claimed…