Category: RDNH

In the domain name dispute case D2021-0048, adjudicated by the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, HBA Holding LLC (Complainant), an Arizona Limited Liability Company, contended against William Sylvester of Internet Tool & Die Company (Respondent) over the domain . The complaint was filed on January 5, 2021, with HBA Holding LLC claiming rights to the…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2020-2608, Wedi GmbH, a German manufacturer, filed a complaint against Dong Jin Kim from the Republic of Korea over the domain name . Wedi GmbH claimed the domain was identical to their trademark and was registered and used in bad faith. The domain was registered by the respondent…

In the realm of internet domain name disputes, the case of D2015-1566, adjudicated by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), presents a compelling study. This case, which revolves around the domain name “zic.com,” pits the complainant, SK lubricants americas, against the respondent, Andrea Sabatini of Webservice Limited. The decision, rendered on November 23, 2015, by…

In the world of domain name disputes, WIPO Case Number D2015-0703 stands out as a notable example. This case, adjudicated by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), involved the domain name “boon.com.” The complainant in this case was Wirecard AG, while the respondent was Telepathy, Inc., Development Services. The decision, delivered by panelists Torsten Bettinger,…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2014-1689, the contention revolved around the domain “trendyhair.com.” The complainant in this case was GIGS United S.L., while the respondent was SIE MANTIC. The panelist responsible for the decision was Brigitte Joppich. The decision, made on November 19, 2014, resulted in the denial of the complaint. This case…

WIPO Case D2014-0878, involving Clearwater Systems, Inc. and Glenn Johnson/Clear Water Systems of Remington Inc. (CWSRI), revolves around the domain name “clearwatersystems.net.” Clearwater Systems, Inc., holding several trademarks for CLEARWATER SYSTEMS, contended that the domain name was identical to its trademarks and accused the respondent of bad faith registration and use. However, the respondent, CWSRI,…

The WIPO case D2014-1733 involved a dispute over the domain name “obagivietnam.com”. The complainant, Obagi Medical Products, Inc., a specialty pharmaceutical company, alleged that the domain name was confusingly similar to its registered OBAGI trademark. The respondent, Phan Thanh Tung of Vietnam, did not submit a formal response. The domain was being used to resell…

The WIPO case D2012-2455 involved a dispute over the domain names “eyemagine.com” and “eyemagine.info”. The complainant, Andrew Etemadi, Founder and Chief Technology Officer for Eyemagine Technology LLC, claimed rights to the ‘EYEMAGINE’ trademark. The respondents, Clough Construction and Deanne Clough, argued their long-standing use of the disputed domain names for legitimate business purposes. The case…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2012-1326, the complainant was S.C. ALTOM CONSULTING S.R.L., and the respondent was Domain Administrator, PortMedia / Moniker Privacy Services. The case revolved around the domain name “altom.com”. The panelists involved in this decision were Alexiev Assen (Presiding), Brown K.C., The Hon Neil, and Christie, Andrew F. The decision…

In the domain name dispute case D2018-1853, Venus et Fleur LLC, a New York-based company, contested the domain name “eternalfleur.com” held by Amanda Wojtas. Filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center on August 13, 2018, the case centered around the alleged similarity between the domain name and Venus et Fleur’s registered ETERNITY trademark. Venus…