Category: RDNH

In the case of Svenska Resegruppen AB vs. Patrik Larsson, Westcoast Digital AB (Case No. D2018-2892), the dispute involved the domain name “flygresor.com.” Svenska Resegruppen AB, a Swedish online travel service company, filed the complaint against Patrik Larsson and Westcoast Digital AB. The domain name in question was registered by the respondent in 2012 and…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2002-0420 was a significant case involving a Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) decision. This case involved a dispute over the domain name, which was the subject of contention between the involved parties. The Complainant in this case argued that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to a…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2001-0552 was a notable case involving a decision of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH). This case revolved around a specific domain name that became the center of a legal dispute between the involved parties. The Complainant in the case argued that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar…

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) case number D2018-0856, concerning the domain name “verdant.com,” is a significant instance in the realm of domain name dispute resolution. This case involves Verdant Services, Inc. as the complainant and Michael Sheikh / VRDT Corporation as the respondent, with the decision being rendered on June 15, 2018. The panelist…

In the domain name dispute case D2018-0670, adjudicated by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the focus was on the domain “sugarex.com”. The complainant in this case was Ferrer Internacional, S.A., a Spanish pharmaceutical company with a history dating back to 1959. The respondent was Domain Admin, Level2 LLC, a United States company that manages…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2017-0891, the complainant was Jones Lang LaSalle IP, Inc., a real estate services and investment management firm from Chicago, Illinois, USA. The respondent was Goi Media from Gwangju, Republic of Korea. The dispute concerned the domain name “jllcoin.com”, registered with Megazone Corp., dba HOSTING.KR. The complaint was filed…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2017-0679 involved a conflict over the domain name “queen.com”. The complainant, Knud Jepsen A/S from Denmark, specialized in growing Kalanchoe plants, while the respondent, Rick Schwartz of Virtual Dates Inc from the United States, was in the domain name trading business. The case was decided by a panel consisting…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2017-0040, Charter Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries, the complainants, filed against Perfect Privacy, LLC and Sheri K Corwin, the respondents, over the domain name “myspectrumnews.com”. The complaint was filed on January 11, 2017. Charter Communications argued that the domain name was confusingly similar to their “Spectrum” trademarks and…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2016-1975 involved Easton Corp Pty Ltd, an Australian company specializing in lingerie and beachwear, and Privacydotlink Customer 951873 / DNS Admin, Best Web Limited over the domain name “hottie.com”. Easton Corp, which operates online at “www.hottie.com.au”, claimed that the domain name was identical to its trademark and argued that…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2016-1620, the complainant, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, a group of public hospitals in Geneva, contended against Aydin Karadeniz, the registrant of the domain names “hug.com”, “hug.net”, and “hug.org”. The complainant, established in 1995 and known as HUG, argued that these domain names were confusingly similar to its trademark.…