The WIPO case D2014-1023, decided on September 2, 2014, presents an intriguing instance in the domain name dispute arena. This case involved the domain “verb.com,” with Moroccanoil Israel Ltd., Verb Hair Products Canada Inc., and Verb Products Inc. as the complainants, and Richard Bloxham as the respondent. The panelists in this case were Robert A.…

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) case D2014-1825, decided on January 19, 2015, is a significant case in the realm of domain name dispute resolution. This case involved the domain name “leadpages.com,” with Avenue 81, Inc. as the complainant and Karl Payne as the respondent. The panel, consisting of David H. Bernstein, Richard G. Lyon,…

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) case DAU2015-0041 represents a notable instance in the domain of intellectual property disputes, specifically focusing on domain name conflicts. This case revolved around the domain name “carmans.com.au” and involved a legal tussle between Carman’s Fine Foods Pty Ltd. as the complainant and Ross Wayne Carman, Carmans Consulting as the…

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Case D2015-0784 presented a complex scenario in domain name dispute resolution. This case involved the domain name “erenter.com” and was brought forth by E-Renter USA Ltd., the complainant, against Domain Hostmaster, Customer ID: 55391430909834, WhoIs Privacy Services Pty. Ltd., and Domain Administrator, Vertical Axis Inc., the respondents. In the…

The WIPO Case D2007-1171 is a notable example in the realm of domain name disputes, particularly involving the issue of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH). In this case, the domain names in question were mycpa.bz, mycpa.com, and mycpa.tv. The complainant was Mypersonalcpa.com Inc., while the respondent was Hawkins, Cloward & Simister. The decision, made by…

In the WIPO Case D2008-0539, the domain name at the center of the dispute was “signsupnow.com”. The complainant in this case was Allegra Holdings LLC, and the respondent was a combination of Hyped Media, Domain By Proxy Inc., and Signs Up Now Inc. The decision, made by panelist Richard G. Lyon, was rendered on June…

In the WIPO Case D2008-1173, the complainant, 1 Model Management, LLC, based in New York, New York, United States, faced off against the respondents, L.A.S. Inc., Latifa Aadess, and 1 Models LLC, based in Huntington Beach, California, United States. The dispute centered around the domain name “onemodels.com”, registered with Intercosmos Media Group d/b/a directNIC.com. This…

In the WIPO Case D2009-1102, the dispute involved the domain name “bwired.com”. The complainant in this case was Bwired Pty Ltd, and the respondent was Eric Adem, associated with bWiredDomains. The decision for this case was made by panelist Jonathan Turner on October 16, 2009. The outcome of the case was the denial of the…

The WIPO Case D2010-0778, adjudicated on July 8, 2010, involved a domain name dispute between Genomatix Software GmbH and Intrexon Corporation. The contested domain name was “genomatix.com”. Genomatix Software GmbH, based in Munich, Germany, alleged that they had rights to the “GENOMATIX” mark and claimed that Intrexon Corporation, from Virginia, USA, had no legitimate interests…

In the domain name dispute case D2020-2958, the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center decided on the conflict between Gainvest Legal Corporation and John Sozanski, Gainvest, LLC over the domain name “gainvest.com”. The complaint, filed by Gainvest Legal Corporation, was rejected, and the panel concluded the case with a finding of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH).…