RDNH Case D2017-1182

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2017-1182, J.D.M. Software B.V. of the Netherlands filed a complaint against Robert Mauro, WDINCO from the USA, over the domain name jdm.com. J.D.M. Software claimed rights to the “JDM” trademark, asserting that the domain name was identical to their trademark and alleging that Mauro had no rights or…

read more

Detailed Overview of WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case D2017-1517: Weeds, Inc. v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Innovation HQ, Inc.

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2017-1517, the complainant was Weeds, Inc., a corporation specializing in industrial and commercial weed control based in Aston, Pennsylvania, USA. They contested the domain name weeds.com, which was registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC. The respondent in this case was Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC of Scottsdale, Arizona, USA…

read more

Detailed Analysis of WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case D2017-1930: Inspectorate America Corporation v. Netcorp, LLC

In the domain name dispute case D2017-1930, adjudicated by the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, the complainant was Inspectorate America Corporation from Florida, USA. The respondent in this case was Netcorp, LLC, based in California, USA. The dispute centered around the domain name loams.com, registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com. Inspectorate America Corporation, an independent…

read more

Insight into WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case D2017-2136: Voys B.V., Voys United B.V. v. Thomas Zou

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2017-2136, Voys B.V. and Voys United B.V., based in the Netherlands, filed a complaint against Thomas Zou of California, USA, regarding the domain name voys.com. The domain, registered by Zou with GoDaddy.com, LLC, had been acquired by him in December 2008. Zou, an investor in four-letter domain names,…

read more

WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case D2017-2549: Robert Bosch GmbH v. Domain Admin, Tucows.com Co

In the domain name dispute case D2017-2549, adjudicated by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the complainant was Robert Bosch GmbH, a large multinational manufacturing company headquartered in Germany. The respondent in this case was Domain Admin, Tucows.com Co, a well-known ICANN-accredited registrar based in Canada. The dispute revolved around the domain name bosch.net. Robert…

read more

Analysis of WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case D2018-0133: Thebuyerpool Limited v. Private Registration/Stephen Pomeroy

In the WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case D2018-0133, Thebuyerpool Limited, a UK-based online property broker, contested the domain name ucado.com, held by Stephen Pomeroy of the United States. The case was filed on January 22, 2018, with Thebuyerpool alleging that the domain was identical or confusingly similar to their UK registered trademarks, and was registered…

read more

Analysis of WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case D2018-0348: The Struggle Against Cybersquatting

In the domain name dispute case D2018-0348, adjudicated under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the conflict revolved around the domain name hmrcrevenuegovuk.com. The complainant in this case was The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs from London, United Kingdom, represented by Demys Limited. The respondent…

read more

RDNH Case D2018-0505

The case D2018-0505, a domain name dispute decided under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), is one of the many cases handled by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). WIPO is a global leader in resolving issues of cybersquatting through the UDRP, providing a swift and cost-effective administrative process for resolving domain name…

read more

Analysis of WIPO Case D2000-0993

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2000-0993, adjudicated in 2000, is a significant case in the history of internet domain name disputes, particularly noted for its outcome involving a decision of “Reverse Domain Name Hijacking” (RDNH). This case involved a dispute over the domain name , with Smart Design LLC as the complainant and Carolyn…

read more

Analysis of WIPO Case D2001-0798

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2001-0798, resolved in 2001, stands out in the history of internet domain name disputes for its outcome involving a decision of “Reverse Domain Name Hijacking” (RDNH). While the specific details about this case, such as the domain name in dispute, the identities of the complainant and respondent, and the…

read more