The WIPO domain name dispute case D2001-1357, adjudicated in 2001, is an important case in the realm of internet domain name disputes, particularly noted for its outcome involving a decision of “Reverse Domain Name Hijacking” (RDNH). Unfortunately, the specific details about this case, such as the domain name in question, the identities of the complainant…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2002-0754 is a noteworthy instance in the realm of internet domain name disputes. Unfortunately, specific details about this case, such as the domain name in question, the identities of the complainant and respondent, and the finer points of their arguments, are not readily available in the public domain. However,…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2004-0158, Domain Finance Ltd, the complainant, filed a case against an unnamed respondent over the domain name . The specific details of the case, including the arguments made by both parties, the evidence presented, and the reasoning behind the decision, are crucial to understanding the panel’s ruling. The…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2005-0309, Jazeera Space Channel TV Station, based in Doha, Qatar, filed a complaint against an entity known as Publishing, located in the United Arab Emirates, over the domain name . The case was represented on the complainant’s side by Al Tamimi & Company. The dispute centered around the…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2007-1598, Liquid Nutrition Inc. filed a complaint against LIQUIDNUTRITION.COM/Vertical Axis Inc. over the domain name . The decision in this case was made by panelists Brown K.C., The Hon Neil Lyon, Richard G. (Presiding), and Sorkin, David E., and the decision date was January 28, 2008. The panel…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2008-0779, Hero, a Swiss food manufacturer, filed a complaint against The Heroic Sandwich of Berkeley, California, for the domain name . Hero claimed the domain was identical to its trademark and accused The Heroic Sandwich of bad faith registration and use. However, the panel found no evidence that…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2009-1594, Zenni Optical, LLC, a company based in California, filed a complaint against DNS Administrator / Cykon Technology Limited of Hong Kong over the domain name . The domain name was registered in May 2002, prior to Zenni Optical’s trademark registrations in 2008 and 2009. Zenni Optical claimed…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2010-1796 involved Webpass, Inc., a telecommunications service provider from San Francisco, California, and Paul Breitenbach of Wellington, Ohio. The disputed domain name was . Webpass, Inc. claimed the domain was identical to its trademark “WEBPASS” and alleged bad faith registration and use by Breitenbach. However, the panel concluded that…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2011-0734 involved the Brazilian evangelical publishing house Graça Artes Gráficas E Editora Ltda. and Domain Amin of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The disputed domain name was . Graça Artes Gráficas claimed the domain name was identical to its registered trademarks and alleged that Domain Amin had no rights to…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2012-0403 involved Dextra Asia Co., Ltd., based in Bangkok, Thailand, and Lakeside Enterprises Limited of Victoria, Mahe, Seychelles. The disputed domain name was . Dextra Asia, a manufacturer and supplier of construction products, held trademark rights for ‘DEXTRA’ and claimed that the domain name was identical to their trademark.…