In the WIPO case D2018-2768, Dialoga Servicios Interactivos, S.A., a Spanish telecommunications company, filed a complaint against Finlead AG, a Swiss company specializing in domain name investments, over the domain name “dialoga.com.” The complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center on December 3, 2018. Dialoga Servicios Interactivos argued that the domain name…

In the domain name dispute case DAU2019-0029, Sportsbet Pty Ltd, The Sporting Exchange Ltd, and Flutter Entertainment Plc (collectively the Complainants) contested the use of the domain name “flutter.com.au” registered by Gaming Investments Pty Ltd (the Respondent). This case was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center on September 27, 2019. The Complainants, part…

In the domain name dispute case Sport and Fashion, Pte. Ltd. v. St. Lawrence Cement Inc. (Case No. D2019-0603), the dispute centered around the domain name “demix.com.” The complainant, Sport and Fashion, Pte. Ltd., a Singapore-based company involved in the sports equipment industry, contended that the domain name was identical to its DEMIX trademark and…

In the notable domain name dispute case of Red Dot GmbH & Co. KG v. Perfect Privacy, LLC / Schuweiler, R. & S. (Case No. D2019-0785), the central issue revolved around the domain name red-dot.com. Red Dot GmbH & Co. KG, a German organization known for its prestigious design awards, filed a complaint against the…

In WIPO case D2018-0973, the complainant, Compañía Logística de Hidrocarburos CLH, S.A., based in Madrid, Spain, contested the domain , owned by DropCatcher.Info / Badminton, Inc. The proceedings began on May 3, 2018, with the complaint alleging that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to its CLH trademarks, arguing for trademark infringement. However,…

In WIPO case D2018-1323, the complainant Gesab, S.A. filed a complaint against Domain Admin / Oyo AS regarding the domain name . The panelist for the case was Lawrence K. Nodine. The decision, made on July 8, 2018, was to deny the complaint. This case highlights the complexities and challenges in domain name disputes, particularly…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2018-1580, Mobius Payments Corporation filed a complaint against David Gobaud over the domain name . The complainant, a payment processing company, claimed rights to the “MOBIUS” trademarks and alleged that the domain was confusingly similar to its marks. The respondent, CEO of Mochi Inc., argued that the domain…

In the WIPO case D2018-1849, Tenaris Connections BV filed a complaint against HugeDomains.com over the domain name . Tenaris, part of the Tenaris Group, a global manufacturer and supplier in the oil and gas industry, argued that the domain was confusingly similar to its trademark “TENARIS”. However, the panel found no evidence that HugeDomains.com, a…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2018-2083, WEDIA SA, a French company specialized in software solutions for marketing and communication, filed a complaint against Office Yui Asia Limited, a Japanese corporation. The dispute involved the domain name , registered by the respondent since June 15, 1997. WEDIA SA argued that the domain name, which…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2018-2238, the complainant, Darryl Davis Seminars, Inc., challenged the registration of the domain name . The respondent was Privacydotlink Customer 656889 / Domain Admin, Abstract Holdings International Ltd. The disputed domain name, registered on July 18, 2002, was associated with a parking page featuring generic pay-per-click links and…