The WIPO domain name dispute case D2018-0118, decided on March 27, 2018, offers a compelling narrative in the arena of intellectual property disputes. This case involved the domain name “t20globalleague.com,” with the Complainant being Cricket South Africa, and the Respondent being Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Sean Stevens, tq6 Inc. Cricket South Africa,…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2018-0242, adjudicated on May 11, 2018, presents a nuanced scenario in the realm of domain name disputes. This case involved the domain name “milton-hotels.com,” with Milton Hotels Limited of Inverness, Scotland, acting as the Complainant and Hong Lu, Omegauk of Milton Keynes, UK, as the Respondent. Milton Hotels Limited,…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2018-0491 presents a captivating example of the complexities involved in domain name disputes, especially those entailing accusations of reverse domain name hijacking (RDNH). In this particular case, the domain in question was “nutrihome.com”, with Fresenius Kabi S.A. of Barcelona, Spain, as the complainant, and Domain Manager, EWEB Development, Inc.,…

In the notable WIPO domain name dispute case D2018-0697, the focus was on the domain name “gamberorosso.com.” The complainant in this case was GAMBERO ROSSO S.p.A., a company with vested interests in the domain name. The respondent was Mr. Michele Dinoia, operating under Macrosten LTD. This dispute was meticulously reviewed by panelist Georges Nahitchevansky, culminating…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2012-0997 I found doesn’t match your request. However, I did find a similar case, D2021-3383, between Securus Technologies, LLC and a Domain Administrator. In this case, the disputed domain name was registered before the complainant, Securus Technologies, had established trademark rights. The panel concluded that the domain name could…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2012-1668, Tarheel Take-Out, LLC v. Versimedia, Inc., involved the domain name . The complainant, Tarheel Take-Out, LLC, alleged that the domain name was identical to its trademark TAKEOUT.COM. However, the panel found that the complainant did not have sufficient trademark rights to the term “takeout.com,” which was deemed generic…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2014-0664 involved Personal Communication Systems, Inc. against CDN Properties Incorporated concerning the domain name . The Complainant, based in North Carolina, USA, provided cloud-based communications technology to medical practices and owned the HEALTHWAVE trademark. The Respondent, based in Panama, had registered the disputed domain name in 2002, predating the…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2014-1367 involved a complaint by Mr. Arif Develier against Domain Administrator / Network Services, MindViews Limited Liability Company regarding the domain name . The complainant, Mr. Arif Develier, claimed to own the restaurant chain “Develi” and held trademarks related to the “Develi” brand. The respondent, a New Zealand-based company,…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2014-2041 involved a complaint by R.V. Kuhns & Associates, Inc. against Gregory Ricks/Whois Privacy Corp./Domain Administrator over the domain name . The complainant, R.V. Kuhns & Associates, Inc., alleged that it had rights in the “RVK” trademark related to investment consulting services and that the respondent’s use of the…

The domain name dispute case D2015-1054, adjudicated by the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, involved the disputed domain name . The complainant was Foundation Fitness LLC, a company specializing in indoor bicycles and bicycle accessories, while the respondent was Jiang Zhou, an individual from New Zealand. Foundation Fitness LLC held various trademarks related to the…