WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case D2017-2549: Robert Bosch GmbH v. Domain Admin, Tucows.com Co

In the domain name dispute case D2017-2549, adjudicated by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the complainant was Robert Bosch GmbH, a large multinational manufacturing company headquartered in Germany. The respondent in this case was Domain Admin, Tucows.com Co, a well-known ICANN-accredited registrar based in Canada. The dispute revolved around the domain name bosch.net. Robert…

read more

Analysis of WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case D2018-0133: Thebuyerpool Limited v. Private Registration/Stephen Pomeroy

In the WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case D2018-0133, Thebuyerpool Limited, a UK-based online property broker, contested the domain name ucado.com, held by Stephen Pomeroy of the United States. The case was filed on January 22, 2018, with Thebuyerpool alleging that the domain was identical or confusingly similar to their UK registered trademarks, and was registered…

read more

Analysis of WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case D2018-0348: The Struggle Against Cybersquatting

In the domain name dispute case D2018-0348, adjudicated under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the conflict revolved around the domain name hmrcrevenuegovuk.com. The complainant in this case was The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs from London, United Kingdom, represented by Demys Limited. The respondent…

read more

RDNH Case D2018-0505

The case D2018-0505, a domain name dispute decided under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), is one of the many cases handled by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). WIPO is a global leader in resolving issues of cybersquatting through the UDRP, providing a swift and cost-effective administrative process for resolving domain name…

read more

Analysis of WIPO Case D2000-0993

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2000-0993, adjudicated in 2000, is a significant case in the history of internet domain name disputes, particularly noted for its outcome involving a decision of “Reverse Domain Name Hijacking” (RDNH). This case involved a dispute over the domain name , with Smart Design LLC as the complainant and Carolyn…

read more

Analysis of WIPO Case D2001-0798

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2001-0798, resolved in 2001, stands out in the history of internet domain name disputes for its outcome involving a decision of “Reverse Domain Name Hijacking” (RDNH). While the specific details about this case, such as the domain name in dispute, the identities of the complainant and respondent, and the…

read more

Analysis of WIPO Case D2001-1357

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2001-1357, adjudicated in 2001, is an important case in the realm of internet domain name disputes, particularly noted for its outcome involving a decision of “Reverse Domain Name Hijacking” (RDNH). Unfortunately, the specific details about this case, such as the domain name in question, the identities of the complainant…

read more

Analysis of WIPO Case D2002-0754

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2002-0754 is a noteworthy instance in the realm of internet domain name disputes. Unfortunately, specific details about this case, such as the domain name in question, the identities of the complainant and respondent, and the finer points of their arguments, are not readily available in the public domain. However,…

read more

Analysis of WIPO Case D2004-0158: Domain Finance Ltd

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2004-0158, Domain Finance Ltd, the complainant, filed a case against an unnamed respondent over the domain name . The specific details of the case, including the arguments made by both parties, the evidence presented, and the reasoning behind the decision, are crucial to understanding the panel’s ruling. The…

read more

Analysis of WIPO Case D2005-0309: Jazeera Space Channel TV Station v. Publishing

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2005-0309, Jazeera Space Channel TV Station, based in Doha, Qatar, filed a complaint against an entity known as Publishing, located in the United Arab Emirates, over the domain name . The case was represented on the complainant’s side by Al Tamimi & Company. The dispute centered around the…

read more