The WIPO domain name dispute case D2008-1149 involved multiple domain names, including alohaapartments.net, arubabeachresort.com, belairresort.net, broadbeachonthepark.com, crowntowersresort.net, enderleygardens.com, equinoxresort.net, imperialsurfresort.com, moroccanresort.com, phoenicianresortapartments.com, raysresort.net, siroccoapartments.com, sttropezresort.com, and zanzibarresort.com. The complainant was Stella IP Pty Ltd., and the respondents were Info Link, Info-Link, and Paul Klerck. The panelists James A. Barker (Presiding), The Hon Neil Brown K.C.,…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2008-1545 involved the domain name “norsk.com”. The complainant in this case was Parallax Group International, Limited Liability Corporation, and the respondent was Anything.com Ltd. The panelists who decided on this case were Michelle Brownlee, David E. Sorkin, and John Swinson (Presiding). The decision was made on December 15, 2008,…

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2010-0606 involved the domain name “altom.com”. The complainant in this case was S.C. ALTOM CONSULTING S.R.L., while the respondent was Domain Administrator, PortMedia / Moniker Privacy Services. The decision, made by a panel including Alexiev Assen, The Hon Neil Brown K.C., and Andrew F. Christie, was reached on September…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2012-1326, the complainant was S.C. ALTOM CONSULTING S.R.L., and the respondent was Domain Administrator, PortMedia / Moniker Privacy Services. The case revolved around the domain name “altom.com”. The panelists involved in this decision were Alexiev Assen (Presiding), Brown K.C., The Hon Neil, and Christie, Andrew F. The decision…

The WIPO case D2012-2455 involved a dispute over the domain names “eyemagine.com” and “eyemagine.info”. The complainant, Andrew Etemadi, Founder and Chief Technology Officer for Eyemagine Technology LLC, claimed rights to the ‘EYEMAGINE’ trademark. The respondents, Clough Construction and Deanne Clough, argued their long-standing use of the disputed domain names for legitimate business purposes. The case…

The WIPO case D2014-1733 involved a dispute over the domain name “obagivietnam.com”. The complainant, Obagi Medical Products, Inc., a specialty pharmaceutical company, alleged that the domain name was confusingly similar to its registered OBAGI trademark. The respondent, Phan Thanh Tung of Vietnam, did not submit a formal response. The domain was being used to resell…

WIPO Case D2014-0878, involving Clearwater Systems, Inc. and Glenn Johnson/Clear Water Systems of Remington Inc. (CWSRI), revolves around the domain name “clearwatersystems.net.” Clearwater Systems, Inc., holding several trademarks for CLEARWATER SYSTEMS, contended that the domain name was identical to its trademarks and accused the respondent of bad faith registration and use. However, the respondent, CWSRI,…

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2014-1689, the contention revolved around the domain “trendyhair.com.” The complainant in this case was GIGS United S.L., while the respondent was SIE MANTIC. The panelist responsible for the decision was Brigitte Joppich. The decision, made on November 19, 2014, resulted in the denial of the complaint. This case…

In the world of domain name disputes, WIPO Case Number D2015-0703 stands out as a notable example. This case, adjudicated by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), involved the domain name “boon.com.” The complainant in this case was Wirecard AG, while the respondent was Telepathy, Inc., Development Services. The decision, delivered by panelists Torsten Bettinger,…

In the realm of internet domain name disputes, the case of D2015-1566, adjudicated by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), presents a compelling study. This case, which revolves around the domain name “zic.com,” pits the complainant, SK lubricants americas, against the respondent, Andrea Sabatini of Webservice Limited. The decision, rendered on November 23, 2015, by…