WIPO Case D2017-0675: Domain Name Dispute and RDNH Decision

In WIPO Case D2017-0675, a domain name dispute was filed by the complainant against the respondent. The case involved a specific domain name which was under scrutiny for potential infringement of rights. The panelists, after thorough evaluation, concluded that the complainant’s claims were not substantiated as per the required criteria under the UDRP. Consequently, the…

read more

FPT Industrie S.p.a. and REM Industrie S.r.l. vs. HugeDomains.Com: WIPO Case D2017-0842

In the WIPO case D2017-0842, the complainants FPT Industrie S.p.a. and REM Industrie S.r.l. filed a complaint against HugeDomains.Com over the domain name “fastmill.com”. The decision was made on July 7, 2017, by a panel consisting of The Hon Neil Brown K.C., José Carlos Erdozain, and Gabriela Kennedy (Presiding). The complaint was ultimately denied. This…

read more

Colussi S.p.A. vs. Andrea Colussi: WIPO Case D2017-1293

In the WIPO case D2017-1293, Colussi S.p.A., a renowned Italian company in the bakery product industry, filed a complaint against Andrea Colussi, the cousin of the company’s current Chairman and a shareholder, over the domain name “colussi.com”. Colussi S.p.A. claimed that the domain was confusingly similar to their registered COLUSSI trademark and that Andrea Colussi…

read more

DealerX Partners, LLC v. Domain Manager, Visionamics/Citytwist Inc. / Lyndon Griffin: WIPO Case D2017-1680

In the WIPO case D2017-1680, DealerX Partners, LLC, a digital marketing specialist for automobile dealers, filed a complaint against Domain Manager, Visionamics/Citytwist Inc., and Lyndon Griffin over the domain names “conquestautomotive.com,” “conquest.email,” and “conquest.marketing.” DealerX claimed infringement of its CONQUEST SERVICE® trademark, asserting the domains were identical and used in bad faith. However, the Panel…

read more

Modz v. He Ming Huang: A Detailed Analysis of WIPO Case D2017-2008

In WIPO case D2017-2008, Modz, a French online fashion retailer, filed a complaint against He Ming Huang over the domain name “modz.com.” Modz claimed rights in the term based on its French trademark, asserting the domain was identical and used in bad faith. However, Huang, a professional poker player from the United States, demonstrated legitimate…

read more

Allianz SE vs. Domain Admin, Whois protection / Domain Administrator, Radio plus, spol.s r.o.: WIPO Case D2017-2277

In WIPO case D2017-2277, Allianz SE, a German financial services company, filed a complaint against the registrants of “agcs.com,” Domain Admin, Whois protection, and Radio plus, spol.s r.o., based in the Czech Republic. The complaint, filed on November 16, 2017, was centered around the domain name “agcs.com,” registered by the respondents on May 31, 2010.…

read more

Australian Rugby Union Limited vs. Domain Manager / Domain Services Pty Ltd: A WIPO Domain Name Decision Case DAU2018-0037

In the WIPO domain name dispute case DAU2018-0037, the complainant, Australian Rugby Union Limited, contested the domain name “wallabies.com.au” registered by Domain Manager, Domain Services Pty Ltd. The complaint was filed on December 3, 2018. The domain name in question was registered on November 22, 2006. The complainant, governing the Australian men’s rugby union team…

read more

Dribbble Holdings Ltd. v. Domain Administrator / Hitsville LLC: A WIPO Domain Name Decision

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2018-0419, Dribbble Holdings Ltd. of Canada filed a complaint against Domain Administrator / Hitsville LLC concerning the domain name “dribble.com.” The domain was registered in 1997, significantly earlier than Dribbble’s use of its trademark, which started in 2009. The complaint was denied as the panel found no evidence…

read more

WIPO Case D2018-0587: UMix, LLC v. Chris McNeeney, Memeplex LTD

In the WIPO domain name dispute case D2018-0587, UMix, LLC, a United States company providing background music services, filed a complaint against Chris McNeeney, Memeplex LTD of the United Kingdom regarding the domain name “umix.com.” The domain was registered by the respondent in 1996 and acquired by them in 2011. UMix LLC claimed trademark rights…

read more

The WIPO Domain Name Dispute of Miray Software AG vs. Perfect Privacy, LLC / Collin Woo

In the WIPO case D2018-0845, Miray Software AG of Germany filed a complaint against Perfect Privacy, LLC and Collin Woo of the United States concerning the domain name “miray.com.” Miray Software, founded in 1996 and renamed in 2000, discovered the domain was already registered by Woo when they attempted to acquire it. Despite Miray Software’s…

read more