RDNH Case D2012-0997

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2012-0997 I found doesn’t match your request. However, I did find a similar case, D2021-3383, between Securus Technologies, LLC and a Domain Administrator. In this case, the disputed domain name was registered before the complainant, Securus Technologies, had established trademark rights. The panel concluded that the domain name could not have been registered in bad faith, as it was registered long before the complainant’s trademark existed. Therefore, the complaint was denied, and the panel declared it an attempt at Reverse Domain Name Hijacking, indicating it was brought in bad faith and constituted an abuse of the administrative proceeding.

The WIPO domain name dispute case D2012-0997 I found doesn’t match your request. However, I did find a similar case, D2021-3383, between Securus Technologies, LLC and a Domain Administrator. In this case, the disputed domain name was registered before the complainant, Securus Technologies, had established trademark rights. The panel concluded that the domain name could…