RDNH Case D2018-2768

In the WIPO case D2018-2768, Dialoga Servicios Interactivos, S.A., a Spanish telecommunications company, filed a complaint against Finlead AG, a Swiss company specializing in domain name investments, over the domain name “dialoga.com.” The complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center on December 3, 2018. Dialoga Servicios Interactivos argued that the domain name was confusingly similar to their trademark, that Finlead AG had no legitimate interest in the domain name, and that it was registered and used in bad faith.

Finlead AG countered that “dialoga” is a generic term used by many companies in various industries and not exclusively associated with the complainant. They also highlighted their business of investing in generic domain names and claimed no bad faith in the acquisition or use of “dialoga.com.”

The case focused on the evaluation of the complainant’s trademark rights against the respondent’s claim of the domain name being a generic term. The decision considered the legitimacy of the domain name’s usage and the assessment of bad faith in its registration and use.

For more detailed information on this case, you can refer to the full decision on the WIPO website: WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2018-2768.

In the WIPO case D2018-2768, Dialoga Servicios Interactivos, S.A., a Spanish telecommunications company, filed a complaint against Finlead AG, a Swiss company specializing in domain name investments, over the domain name “dialoga.com.” The complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center on December 3, 2018. Dialoga Servicios Interactivos argued that the domain name…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *